ipswich.gov.uk

Site Ref: IP150d (Policy SP2) Land south of Ravenswood

Showing comments and forms 1 to 6 of 6

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26164

Received: 10/02/2020

Respondent: Chris Warhurst

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Skylarks have been seen nesting on this area. Bee orchids have been seen flowering in this area - which is protected under Section 13 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981). These are 2 rare and protected species. The traffic connection at the main roundabout,the only access to/ from the Ravenswood estate, is beyond breaking point. Over 30 minute traffic jams in and out of estate particularly during school drop off/ collections, retail/ restaurant deliveries and times of high demand, peak commuter times and when roundabout congested. Local amenities (doctors, dentists and schools), sewage and drainage are at capacity.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26172

Received: 04/02/2020

Respondent: Ravenswood Residents Association

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

IP150a, IP150d and IP150e equate to 254 houses. Should fully reflect 65.8% private housing and 34.2% social housing mix. Recommend additional new access to Ravenswood to cope with anticipated surge in traffic volumes. Already heavy congestion at access point during; morning/ evening peaks, school drop-off/ pick-up, and, lunch times, which prevents emergency vehicles access. Does "Highway Network" just refer to the Nacton Road/ Thrasher Roundabout or ALL local roads? Second access road should relieve pressure for whole of Ravenswood, not just new sites. Upgrading private road to south of Ravenswood needed as second access. Has additional pupil demand been considered?

Change suggested by respondent:

A new second access road should be included and should serve the whole of Ravenswood, not just any new sites. Consider pupil demand.

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26180

Received: 28/01/2020

Respondent: Ms Sally Wainman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Concerned about the change to the Local Plan in Ravenswood off Alnesbourne Crescent. New residents will put pressure on the sources of the local GP surgery.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26186

Received: 10/02/2020

Respondent: Hallowtree Scout Activity Centre

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

This area of land borders an AONB which would be negatively affected by additional vehicular traffic in the area. The existing access track to Bridge Wood/Orwell Meadows/Hallowtree Campsite is already in disrepair. Additional traffic in the area would be at the detriment to the properties in the Alnesbourn Priory site. It is a short-sighted effort by the council to boost housing in an area which is unequipped to handle the additional capacity. No work should be allowed to take place. The land must be kept undisturbed which will allow the flora and fauna to develop.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments:

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26338

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Ravenswood Environmental Group

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Representation Summary:

Site IP150d is proposed for 34 homes but its contrived and unjustified shape demonstrates that it cannot accommodate 34 homes as frontage development. The site is of considerable ecological value and is used as Public Open Space. If it is to be developed then it should be masterplanned with other sites as part of one mixed use criteria based policy

Change suggested by respondent:

Delete site 150d

Object

Ipswich Borough Council Local Plan Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) DPD Review - Final Draft

Representation ID: 26610

Received: 02/03/2020

Respondent: Ipswich School

Agent: Mr Matt Clarke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Site IP150d: Allocated in 1997 Local Plan as part of site ref: 6.1. Remainder of Ravenswood community has been built out, but several parcels remain undeveloped. It is suggested that a more cautious approach is taken to the likelihood of delivery being achieved within the Plan Period.

Change suggested by respondent:

Not specified

Attachments: