Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Conservative Group search
New searchComment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 43:
Representation ID: 25302
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
The threshold for affordable housing in private market developments should be flexible dependant on the nature of the development and should be negotiated with the developers.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 44:
Representation ID: 25303
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
To speed up the developments this must be considered on a case by case basis.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 45:
Representation ID: 25304
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Location is always going to be difficult; but we should insist on more smaller sites rather than larger sites such as West Meadows. Evidence suggests larger sites can cause more problems the larger they get.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 49:
Representation ID: 25305
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Small businesses should be encouraged to provide local services as they can become the lifeblood of the community.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 50:
Representation ID: 25306
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
This should be addressed on a case by case basis but we should consider mixed use developments such as those in Norwich.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 51:
Representation ID: 25307
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
No.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 54:
Representation ID: 25308
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Ensure IBC & SCC have the same objectives for transport and are working towards the same goals rather than working against each other for political reasons.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 55:
Representation ID: 25309
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Cheaper parking for electric vehicles and more charging points. Potential for tax breaks to employers who promote sustainable transport for their employees.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 56:
Representation ID: 25310
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Continued support for the Upper Orwell Crossings as they have the potential to allow changes to the gyratory that would benefit the town as a whole.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 59:
Representation ID: 25311
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Short Stay parking in IBC car parks should be cheaper to encourage more visitors.
See attached.