ipswich.gov.uk

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Search representations

Results for Conservative Group search

New search New search

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 43:

Representation ID: 25302

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

The threshold for affordable housing in private market developments should be flexible dependant on the nature of the development and should be negotiated with the developers.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 44:

Representation ID: 25303

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

To speed up the developments this must be considered on a case by case basis.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 45:

Representation ID: 25304

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

Location is always going to be difficult; but we should insist on more smaller sites rather than larger sites such as West Meadows. Evidence suggests larger sites can cause more problems the larger they get.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 49:

Representation ID: 25305

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

Small businesses should be encouraged to provide local services as they can become the lifeblood of the community.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 50:

Representation ID: 25306

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

This should be addressed on a case by case basis but we should consider mixed use developments such as those in Norwich.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 51:

Representation ID: 25307

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

No.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 54:

Representation ID: 25308

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

Ensure IBC & SCC have the same objectives for transport and are working towards the same goals rather than working against each other for political reasons.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 55:

Representation ID: 25309

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

Cheaper parking for electric vehicles and more charging points. Potential for tax breaks to employers who promote sustainable transport for their employees.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 56:

Representation ID: 25310

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

Continued support for the Upper Orwell Crossings as they have the potential to allow changes to the gyratory that would benefit the town as a whole.

Full text:

See attached.

Comment

Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review

Question 59:

Representation ID: 25311

Received: 30/10/2017

Respondent: Conservative Group

Representation Summary:

Short Stay parking in IBC car parks should be cheaper to encourage more visitors.

Full text:

See attached.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.