Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Search representations
Results for Conservative Group search
New searchComment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 62:
Representation ID: 25312
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
The group supports the idea of changing the axis of the town centre to draw it towards the waterfront. We believe that Westgate St after the Museum St junction and Carr St should be excluded from the Central Shopping Area. This would be to encourage more retail units in the streets towards the Waterfront and to allow a change of uses in the excluded streets to housing/leisure.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 64:
Representation ID: 25313
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
The Westgate site has the potential to become a major attraction within Ipswich. All possible uses should be considered, and it should not be just considered for retail usage.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 66:
Representation ID: 25314
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
We should protect and promote local retail centres as far as possible. Encouraging use of the sites has extensive community benefits and is excellent for the environment by reducing car travel times.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 71:
Representation ID: 25315
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
No, the market should determine whether a business is viable.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 72:
Representation ID: 25316
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Lots of ideas already outlined promote Ipswich as a cultural and leisure hotspot which in turn would increase tourism.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 74:
Representation ID: 25317
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Ensure suitable drainage and sewerage infrastructure is in place before a development takes place rather than by the time it is completed.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 82:
Representation ID: 25318
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Street trees should be protected in all cases and we should encourage the planting of far more trees within the Borough as they undeniably add to the fabric of the area and have social and environmental benefits.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 88:
Representation ID: 25319
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
The Upper Orwell Crossings will have a major effect on the traffic around the town. This could ease the congestion within the gyratory allowing better pedestrian access to the waterfront and allowing increased exposure and usage to the cultural assets in this area.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 90:
Representation ID: 25320
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
No, a standards approach should not be used. As with many other items this should be considered on a case by case basis. Some of the smaller areas of open space in recent developments have proved to be unpopular and difficult to maintain efficiently. If we have such a shortage of housing space, then we need to resist the addition of extra smaller open space areas and instead use contributions from developers to increase the standards of what we already have.
See attached.
Comment
Issues and Options for the Ipswich Local Plan Review
Question 93:
Representation ID: 25321
Received: 30/10/2017
Respondent: Conservative Group
Personally living in the North West of Ipswich I have never considered there to be a lack of green space in the area and was surprised when I saw the statistic. With that in mind I do not think there is the need for additional green space.
See attached.