ipswich.gov.uk
CS9
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1683
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Marian Pitt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1690
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs J N Paterson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1697
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Colin Mudd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1704
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Mudd
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1711
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs E A Sherman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1718
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr S L J Sherman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1725
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Benson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1732
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Benson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1739
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Brian E Grimwood
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1746
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Anne Mason
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1753
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Keith Valentine
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1760
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Oliver Valentine
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1767
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Mary Valentine
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1774
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Julian Mason
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1781
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Helen Mason
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1788
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr D Chittock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1795
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs J Chittock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1802
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Ian Abbott
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1809
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Jamie Abbott
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1816
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Rosemary Abbott
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1823
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Catherine Topham
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1830
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Voules
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1837
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Miss Voules
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1844
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Bullmore
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1851
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Constance Jeffery
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1858
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Hosking
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1865
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Mark Pond
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1872
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Becker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1879
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Becker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1886
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr J M Adams
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.
See attached.