Object

Representation ID: 1263

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Milner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1270

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs J Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1277

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs F Ashbolt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1284

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Elizabeth Beeson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1291

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs D Graves

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1298

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Rosemary Holley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1305

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs K Humphries

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1312

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Mary Hunt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1319

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs A Coleman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1326

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Fordham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1333

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Jill Catto

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1340

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs M Finch

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1347

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Michael Warren

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1354

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Lois Warren

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1361

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Vernon Stiff

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1368

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Dianne Gazeley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1375

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Chris and Wendy Brown

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1382

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Chris and Wendy Brown

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1389

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr P Skinner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1396

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs A M Skinner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1403

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Michael Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1410

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Susan Hill

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1417

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Michael Osborne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1424

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Jean Osborne

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1431

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Steven J Chapman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1438

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Mary D Chapman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1445

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr David C Adams

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1452

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Sharon Adams

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1459

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Terry Gravett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1466

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Veronica Wallis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.