Object

Representation ID: 1473

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Alec Baker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1480

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Joan P Boston

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1487

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Brock

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1494

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr John Hicks

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1501

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr R Northfield

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1508

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs S Northfield

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1515

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr M Northfield

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1522

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Helen Johnson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1529

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Barry Fillis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1536

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Patricia Fillis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1543

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Nadine Coleman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1550

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr David Coleman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1557

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Thomas Coleman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1564

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr N Parkinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1571

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs A Parkinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1578

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Peter Graham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1585

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Dominic Isles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1592

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Andrew Isles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1599

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Delia J Isles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1606

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Charlotte Zahn

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1613

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Jennings

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1620

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Francis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1627

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Ben Foster

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1634

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Lois Foster

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1641

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr A Hutchinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1648

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs S Hutchinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1655

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Angela Brett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1662

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Christopher R Brett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1669

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr K A Brett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1676

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Grahame Pitt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.