CS10
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 828
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There are data gaps in the SPD which may render the Core Strategy unsustainable, e.g. on hydrology, topography, traffic trends, road adequacy, access and exits, congestion, rat runs, air pollution, drainage and flooding, country park allocation and delivery. Also the Peter Brett report on viability has been rejected by developers.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 829
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
There are policy gaps in the in the CSFR. Transport - IBC should consider reinstating former transport policies from the 2001 draft Local Plan. The SCC traffic reduction strategy needs to be reassessed and IBC should through the CSFR address multiple impacts from new development on transport systems, air quality, road safety and congestion. Flood risk and management - requires a new policy direction at the Council and more awareness of the changing nature of drainage and new legislation and responsibilities.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 830
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
How will IBC control delivery at the Northern Fringe and ensure orderly development? What competence does the Council have to manage such a complex development with reducing resources? The plans are inconsistent with localism. Ipswich must avoid bland and dense development with drainage and subsidence issues like elsewhere. There will also be issues around constructions noise that will need to be addressed.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 831
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The detail of the Northern Fringe should be dealt with through the CSFR not through an SPD. SOCS made this point in 2009 when the Local Development Scheme was changed. Significant changes contained in the CSFR, including multiple starts, will impact adversely on the SPD. The Core Strategy should set out the SPD requirement for development sequencing, and control the number of sites to be operated by any one developer at any one time.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 832
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to the change in wording to CS10 which changes the prerequisite for permission being granted from the adoption of the SPD to its preparation only. It does not strengthen the SPD.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 833
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
SOCS query the viability of the Red House site because of flood risk, high ground water, TPOs, biological features, archaeology and the need to adequately buffer noise from the railway. Any playing pitches would need to be located on flat, well drained land. Also the whole Northern Fringe site involves the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land. SOCS further query the adequacy of Westerfield Road to accommodate the traffic from housing, the secondary school, the district centre and so on. It is unsustainable and may be unsafe.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 847
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Number of people: 323
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Locating new homes in Ipswich without new jobs for residents within the Borough or near to new sites of employment will breach Policy CS5 (which we support). Locating 3,500 new homes on the Northern Fringe will force people to commute to centres of new employment. As there are no existing or proposed direct bus routes this will mean they will travel by car. This is clearly not sustainable and in breach of Policy CS5. Therefore the CS is currently unsound.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 855
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group
Number of people: 323
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Strongly object to multiple starts, which will work against policies CS2 and CS3 by undermining urban regeneration. Unintended consequences could include increased disturbance to residents over a longer period and piecemeal development which lacks coordinated bus routes. Mechanisms for controlling these risks e.g. development sequencing should be included in the CSFR and developers should be limited to operating one site at any one time. Pitch provision should be reassessed and a specific area allocated. Bullet b object to 'amplify' as its meaning is not clear. Bullet d. should specify the sequencing of housing and infrastructure delivery.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 889
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Suffolk County Council
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The flexibility over land release provided by the revised policy is understandable. The specific references to primary road infrastructure, schools and library are welcome and provide a greater degree of weight and, therefore certainty. The triggers for delivery (table 8B) provide a clear framework, particularly for the strategic infrastructure. Whilst the detail is likely to be confirmed while the core strategy is progressed, the County Council has made it clear that a new secondary school would be needed by 2020. The timing of occupation of the 500 dwellings, the trigger for its delivery, will need to be kept under review.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 899
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr David Parker
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 913
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr D Cook
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 915
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr John D Jordan
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 922
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Janet Johnson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 929
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Mary Ames
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 936
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Alexander McDonald
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 943
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Rowell Bell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 950
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Bernard Jasper
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 957
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Nigel Grant
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 964
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr D E Heckels
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 971
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Graham H Mitchell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 978
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr C Watson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 985
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Leslie Palmer
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 992
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Michael Pert
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 999
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Jaimie Greig
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1006
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Peter Stonebridge
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1013
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Derek Rose
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1020
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr I Coleman
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1027
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Stephen Traynor
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1034
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Miss Hannah Devine
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.
Object
Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review
Representation ID: 1041
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Susan Arbuthnot
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.
See attached.