ipswich.gov.uk

CS10

Showing comments and forms 31 to 60 of 788

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 828

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

There are data gaps in the SPD which may render the Core Strategy unsustainable, e.g. on hydrology, topography, traffic trends, road adequacy, access and exits, congestion, rat runs, air pollution, drainage and flooding, country park allocation and delivery. Also the Peter Brett report on viability has been rejected by developers.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 829

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

There are policy gaps in the in the CSFR. Transport - IBC should consider reinstating former transport policies from the 2001 draft Local Plan. The SCC traffic reduction strategy needs to be reassessed and IBC should through the CSFR address multiple impacts from new development on transport systems, air quality, road safety and congestion. Flood risk and management - requires a new policy direction at the Council and more awareness of the changing nature of drainage and new legislation and responsibilities.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 830

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

How will IBC control delivery at the Northern Fringe and ensure orderly development? What competence does the Council have to manage such a complex development with reducing resources? The plans are inconsistent with localism. Ipswich must avoid bland and dense development with drainage and subsidence issues like elsewhere. There will also be issues around constructions noise that will need to be addressed.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 831

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The detail of the Northern Fringe should be dealt with through the CSFR not through an SPD. SOCS made this point in 2009 when the Local Development Scheme was changed. Significant changes contained in the CSFR, including multiple starts, will impact adversely on the SPD. The Core Strategy should set out the SPD requirement for development sequencing, and control the number of sites to be operated by any one developer at any one time.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 832

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Object to the change in wording to CS10 which changes the prerequisite for permission being granted from the adoption of the SPD to its preparation only. It does not strengthen the SPD.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 833

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Save Our Country Spaces

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

SOCS query the viability of the Red House site because of flood risk, high ground water, TPOs, biological features, archaeology and the need to adequately buffer noise from the railway. Any playing pitches would need to be located on flat, well drained land. Also the whole Northern Fringe site involves the loss of best and most versatile agricultural land. SOCS further query the adequacy of Westerfield Road to accommodate the traffic from housing, the secondary school, the district centre and so on. It is unsustainable and may be unsafe.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 847

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Locating new homes in Ipswich without new jobs for residents within the Borough or near to new sites of employment will breach Policy CS5 (which we support). Locating 3,500 new homes on the Northern Fringe will force people to commute to centres of new employment. As there are no existing or proposed direct bus routes this will mean they will travel by car. This is clearly not sustainable and in breach of Policy CS5. Therefore the CS is currently unsound.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 855

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Northern Fringe Protection Group

Number of people: 323

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Strongly object to multiple starts, which will work against policies CS2 and CS3 by undermining urban regeneration. Unintended consequences could include increased disturbance to residents over a longer period and piecemeal development which lacks coordinated bus routes. Mechanisms for controlling these risks e.g. development sequencing should be included in the CSFR and developers should be limited to operating one site at any one time. Pitch provision should be reassessed and a specific area allocated. Bullet b object to 'amplify' as its meaning is not clear. Bullet d. should specify the sequencing of housing and infrastructure delivery.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 889

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Suffolk County Council

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The flexibility over land release provided by the revised policy is understandable. The specific references to primary road infrastructure, schools and library are welcome and provide a greater degree of weight and, therefore certainty. The triggers for delivery (table 8B) provide a clear framework, particularly for the strategic infrastructure. Whilst the detail is likely to be confirmed while the core strategy is progressed, the County Council has made it clear that a new secondary school would be needed by 2020. The timing of occupation of the 500 dwellings, the trigger for its delivery, will need to be kept under review.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 899

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr David Parker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 913

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr D Cook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 915

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr John D Jordan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 922

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Janet Johnson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 929

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Mary Ames

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 936

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Alexander McDonald

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 943

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Rowell Bell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 950

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Bernard Jasper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 957

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Nigel Grant

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 964

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr D E Heckels

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 971

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Graham H Mitchell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 978

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr C Watson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 985

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Leslie Palmer

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 992

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Michael Pert

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 999

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Jaimie Greig

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1006

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Peter Stonebridge

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1013

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Derek Rose

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1020

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr I Coleman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1027

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Stephen Traynor

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1034

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Miss Hannah Devine

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.

Object

Draft Core Strategy and Policies Focused Review

Representation ID: 1041

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Susan Arbuthnot

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

CS10 proposes multi-site development across the whole Northern Fringe from the outset. This needs to be controlled to avoid a free for all and having one large building site for the next 20 years. The whole of the Northern Fringe should not be allocated at this time since it will have a negative impact on regenerating brownfield sites including the Waterfront. Jobs growth sites (e.g. Futura Park) are not easily reached from the Northern Fringe by public/sustainable transport. Since sufficient jobs growth is not forecast in the Town Centre commuting by car would seem inevitable, affecting congestion and air quality.

Full text:

See attached.