CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22613
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr R Paul
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22621
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Paul
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22629
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sue Humphrys
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22637
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Bryn Humphrys
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22645
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Lynne Morley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22653
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Neil Morley
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22661
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Harry Downes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22669
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Margaret Downes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22677
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr R M Alexander
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22685
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs J W Alexander
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22693
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22701
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22714
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Andrew Isles
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22741
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Richard and Elizabeth Howse
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22759
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mrs Slyvia D Carthew
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22769
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: The Occupier
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22778
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Michael Hurrell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22787
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Adrian Smith
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22805
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: R Green
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22814
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: J Green
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22823
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Rosemary Hunting
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22832
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Malcolm Gray
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22841
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Margaret Gray
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22850
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: R Scopes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22859
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: M Clarke
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22868
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Mark Ellis
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22877
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: J R Corbett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22886
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Barry Dye
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22895
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr Roger Allum
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 22904
Received: 03/03/2015
Respondent: Mr G L Angell
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable as to date there has been no real job growth since 2001 and public sector jobs are set to reduce. This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.