CS13: Planning for Jobs Growth
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23344
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Tom Cheen
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23357
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Sarah Jennings
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23383
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Roger Holt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23396
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Gillian Holt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23409
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Colin Bennett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23422
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Chelsea Bennett
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23435
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs J Cole-Jones
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23448
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23461
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr & Mrs T B Strutt
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23513
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Ipswich Wildlife Group
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23526
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Hannah Lawes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23539
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Lee Lawes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23552
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Cindy Lawes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23565
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jane Tywndale-Biscoe
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23578
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Robert Ian Bullock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23591
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Bridget Bullock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23617
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr N Tappin
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23630
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Ian Ling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23643
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Jane Ling
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23656
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Keith Williams
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23682
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Miss Sheila Hancock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23695
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John Alcock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23708
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sheila Alcock
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23721
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr B Hemming
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23734
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Sandra Moore
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? No
A report by Peter Brett Associates calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich. The jobs target of in the region of 12,500 jobs is unrealistic and undeliverable This is unsustainable and not compliant with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF).
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23747
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr R English
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23799
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Gareth Ward
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23812
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Michelle Ward
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23825
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mr K Bannister
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.
Object
Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies Development Plan Document Review
Representation ID: 23838
Received: 25/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs S Lydford
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
A recent report by Peter Brett Associates (listed on the IBC website) calls into question the viability of developing new offices, industrial units, warehousing and large retail offerings with Ipswich. This challenges the ability of the CS to deliver the massive jobs growth target. For soundness the CS needs to address the severe obstacle to growth identified and produce a specific and realistic jobs target for the Borough of Ipswich.
See attached.