Object

Representation ID: 1053

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr T Humphries

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1060

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Peter Kent

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1067

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Kevin Holley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1074

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Graves

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1081

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Philip Beeson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1088

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr R Ashbolt

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1095

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr I Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1102

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Ms Armstrong

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1109

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Dr Nick Milner

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1116

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Roy Sadler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1123

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Mary Currey

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1130

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr D Maister

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1137

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Andrew Catto

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1144

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Dr Michael Fordham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1151

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr E Finch

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1158

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr K Newlands

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1165

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Michael Penman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1172

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs D Newlands

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1179

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Ruby Rose

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1186

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Ann Stonebridge

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1193

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Karen Greig

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1200

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Rani Pert

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1207

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Rosaleen Palmer

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1214

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs J A Watson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1221

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Linda Cole

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1228

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mr Daniel Mitchell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1235

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Lynda Grant

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1242

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Heather Jasper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1249

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs K Maister

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.

Object

Representation ID: 1256

Received: 10/03/2014

Respondent: Mrs Pauline Sadler

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The target for brownfield site development has been removed. We feel this should be reinstated and priority given to regenerating these sites over developing the Northern Fringe greenfield site.