ipswich.gov.uk
Site Ref: IP261 (UC N/A) Land at River Hill
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 179
Received: 09/03/2014
Respondent: Mr Kirk Schartau
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Unsustainable socially, economically and environmentally.
Poses dangers to the public.
It does not represent a rational allocation of sites across Ipswich.
Concern of adverse effect of the proposed use on local business.
The proposal is unsustainable socially, economically and environmentally.
The proposed site poses dangers to the public. A member of the public was recently killed on the A14 in an accident involving a horse that escaped from a gypsy site nearby. I have witnesed horses that have escaped. Bramford already suffers a nuisance from horses left on private land in the village, and I fear that the land behind the proposed Site Allocation will be similarly used.
It does not represent a fair or rational allocation of sites across Ipswich.
I am concerned it will adversely affect local businesses. These include Clarice House where I have been a member, but would not feel safe if this site were to go ahead.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 183
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: mrs christina halliwell
Legally compliant? No
Sound? Yes
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Object to the proposed plans for River Hill.
I would like to object to the proposed plans for River hill. As i feel living with in the community it would be bad idea. After the incident that happened in July on Henniker playing field. I had damage caused to my property. I understand its not henniker field for the proposal but the field would be the closest play area to the site. Also there is local businesses to think lumberjack and clarice house I fear it would not do there business any good, I personally would not feel comfy leaving my vehicle parked while i shopped or relaxed.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 184
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Katie Quinton
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Do not want the proposed development. We already have a site this end of town west meadows. rethink this one to another area of town.
Green belt issue between Bramford and Ipswich
Noise levels and safety for the travellers and their children
I had to suffer travellers ruining my summer last year being at the end of my road on the park, my children could not use the park as the travellers had overtook the site.
This site is directly behind the park, next to the A14 which is a busy road surely this is not suitable to have families near and the noise would be excessive for them
The school in Bramford where my children attend has no more space for other children. I am concerned about effects on businesses at clarice house and Lumberjacks.
I am worried about crime and safety.
I was also under the impression that there was some sort of green belt between bramford and ipswich that could not be built on this must therefore go against this rule. How come its one rule for one but not for others.
Where would the waste go? There is no drainage on this site, whoc would pay for this us taxpayers?
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 196
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Dr Benedict Cadet
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Underpinning policies regarding the site are flawed.
Please see my representations regarding Policy DM41 and Policy CS11.
Underpinning policies regarding the site are flawed.
Please see my representations regarding Policy DM41 and Policy CS11.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 234
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mr MJM Cadet
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
1. Traffic
The Ipswich-Bramford road along the site is a fast road, and may be dangerous.
2. Proximity to A14
The A14 nearby is incredibly noisy and produces air pollution. Is this safe?
3. Entry/Exit
The current access to the site is only via a single entryway on the Bramford Road. Midsuffolk council did not allow this with the adjoining Clarice house.
4. Provision of basic services
There are very few basic services sited within 1KM of this location.
5. Provision of businesses/work in local area
Where will the people living here work?
There may be difficulty getting planning permission for new businesses onsite.
1. Traffic
The Ipswich-Bramford road along the site is a fast road, and may be dangerous.
2. Proximity to A14
The A14 nearby is incredibly noisy and produces air pollution. Is this safe?
3. Entry/Exit
The current access to the site is only via a single entryway on the Bramford Road. Midsuffolk council did not allow this with the adjoining Clarice house.
4. Provision of basic services
There are very few basic services sited within 1KM of this location.
5. Provision of businesses/work in local area
Where will the people living here work?
There may be difficulty getting planning permission for new businesses onsite.
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 289
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: Mrs Barbara Wood
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The site was refused permission for housing due to proximity to the A14. Five pitches is an unrealistic figure. Vehicular access to the site is not safe as it is on a bend near the A14 bridge and therefore has poor visibility. Concern the development wouild have a negative effect on neighbouring Clarice House
see attached
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 291
Received: 10/03/2014
Respondent: J Wood
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The site is unsuitable due to access constraints onto a busy road. A previous housing proposal was refused due to noise and pollution form the nearby A14. Concern adjacent Clarice House would be negatively affected by the proposal. The site would hold more than the proposed 5 pitches and the fear is that the number would be increased.
see attached
Object
Draft Site Allocations and Policies (incorporating IP-One Area Action Plan) Development Plan Document
Representation ID: 292
Received: 11/03/2014
Respondent: Shirley Rhodes
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? Not specified
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
The proposal would insensify an existing concentration of traveller sites in west Ipswich. The site is sufficiently large that more pitches could be added in the future. Use of the site would erode the gap between Ipswich and Bramford. Housing on the site has already been refused due to proximity to the A14. Bramford Road is busy and access to the site has poor visibility. Few other sites have been considered.
see attached