Object

Representation ID: 22684

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs J W Alexander

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Object

Representation ID: 22692

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Object

Representation ID: 22700

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Adrian Morphew Pauline Turpin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Object

Representation ID: 22712

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Andrew Isles

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22739

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Richard and Elizabeth Howse

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Object

Representation ID: 22757

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Slyvia D Carthew

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Object

Representation ID: 22767

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: The Occupier

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22776

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Hurrell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22785

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Adrian Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22803

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: R Green

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22812

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: J Green

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22821

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Rosemary Hunting

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22830

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Malcolm Gray

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22839

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Margaret Gray

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22848

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: R Scopes

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22857

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: M Clarke

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22866

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mark Ellis

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22875

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: J R Corbett

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22884

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Dye

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22893

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Roger Allum

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22902

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr G L Angell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22911

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Judy Stammers

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22920

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: G Gartan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22929

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Peter Todd

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22938

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr L Linnell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Object

Representation ID: 22947

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr K Walker

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Object

Representation ID: 22956

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: J Peters

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22965

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: R A Young

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22974

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr James Tudor Cooper

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 22983

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Spurling

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.