Object

Representation ID: 22992

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr John Titlow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23001

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs K Thompson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23010

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr G L Angell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23019

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Andrew Hendry

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23028

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Virginia Hendry

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23037

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr D A Bushell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23046

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs S A Bushell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23073

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr & Mrs Brian and Carol Perks

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

It's unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over plan timescales. How will infrastructure be provided? The CS should be based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm a European designated habitat. Allowing multi-site starts will result in severe congestion and damage the attractiveness and prosperity of Ipswich. With few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites.

Object

Representation ID: 23082

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: N/A Cracknell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23091

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Neil Bateman

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23109

Received: 03/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs Anna Brennan

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23136

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs J Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23147

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Paul Robinson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23158

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Yvonne Bruce

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23169

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Ashley Watson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23180

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Richard Attenborrow

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23191

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: J Mehmed

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23202

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Claire Thorneloe

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23213

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Kathryn Hatcher

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23224

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Owen Funtham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23235

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Mark Funtham

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23246

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr Barry Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23257

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: B Burley

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23268

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: A Exworth-Cook

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23279

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: R F Gladwell

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23290

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: C Steward

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23301

Received: 05/03/2015

Respondent: Mr I Evans

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The plan allocates the whole of the Garden Suburb for approximately 3,500 new dwellings, plus 10,000 homes in other parts of Ipswich. How will infrastructure be provided? Country Park delivery unlikely until at least 2025 with multi start development before 2021 and immediate removal of trees, hedgerows, habitats, farm land. This is not acceptable. The plan will not deliver the park successfully and in a timely fashion. The Council has not listened to local opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 23310

Received: 02/03/2015

Respondent: Mrs B A Coulter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Object

Representation ID: 23313

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr David Cole-Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

It is unsound to allocate the entire Northern Fringe when its delivery may not be viable over the plan timescales. To lower this risk the CS should include a plan based on co-operating more closely with neighbouring LAs to deliver homes growth. The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not adversely affect the integrity of a European designated habitat. For soundness, policy CS10 and Infrastructure Table 8B need to be revised. Allocating the entire Northern Fringe for immediate development through multi-site starts is a high risk strategy that will result in severe traffic congestion for both North Ipswich and the town centre and will damage the future attractiveness and prosperity of town. With so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements. In response to a planning application by Mersea Homes /CBRE Global Investors for the first phase of the Ipswich Garden Suburb, Suffolk County Council stated with regard to traffic '... the development has a severe impact on network performance and travel time.' IBC has been pinning their hopes on getting people out of their cars and onto public transport but with so few new jobs being created in the town centre, residents will mainly have to commute by car to jobs growth sites. The effectiveness of the Core Strategy to deliver the Ipswich Garden Suburb is doubtful without additional road improvements and capacity such as a northern bypass or link road. New measures will also be required to ensure air quality does not deteriorate.

Object

Representation ID: 23320

Received: 25/02/2015

Respondent: Mr David Cole-Jones

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The CS cannot guarantee delivery of the Country Park in a timely manner and so demonstrate it will not harm the integrity of a European designated habitat. CS10 and table 8B need to be revised.